<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Do We Choose Our Own Tools?</title>
	<link>http://ateachersthoughts.com/educational-technology/why-do-we-choose-our-own-tools/</link>
	<description>Learning and Science in the 21st Century</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Biche</title>
		<link>http://ateachersthoughts.com/educational-technology/why-do-we-choose-our-own-tools/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Biche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ateachersthoughts.com/educational-technology/why-do-we-choose-our-own-tools/#comment-931</guid>
		<description>Discussion with students is a great idea.  Not only would the kids have to weigh the reasons for choosing an open platform compared to a closed environment.  This would teach not only internet safety but communication skills.

I think there are a fair number of teachers who would prefer the walled garden approach.  Often times because they worry about potential risks and maybe are not comfortable handling situations with their current skill set.  Web publishing tools are very easy to use and I have seen first hand how someone's lack of knowledge regarding privacy and internet posting can cause problems.  So I respect someone for knowing their limits.  

A walled garden can be a nice place to start with students and teachers who have not published online for school in the past. he environment is "safe" and could lead to a transition.  What would be ideal is to have a switch, controlled by the teacher that opens the gate or closes the gate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discussion with students is a great idea.  Not only would the kids have to weigh the reasons for choosing an open platform compared to a closed environment.  This would teach not only internet safety but communication skills.</p>
<p>I think there are a fair number of teachers who would prefer the walled garden approach.  Often times because they worry about potential risks and maybe are not comfortable handling situations with their current skill set.  Web publishing tools are very easy to use and I have seen first hand how someone&#8217;s lack of knowledge regarding privacy and internet posting can cause problems.  So I respect someone for knowing their limits.  </p>
<p>A walled garden can be a nice place to start with students and teachers who have not published online for school in the past. he environment is &#8220;safe&#8221; and could lead to a transition.  What would be ideal is to have a switch, controlled by the teacher that opens the gate or closes the gate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Riddell</title>
		<link>http://ateachersthoughts.com/educational-technology/why-do-we-choose-our-own-tools/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Riddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ateachersthoughts.com/educational-technology/why-do-we-choose-our-own-tools/#comment-930</guid>
		<description>Rick,

Many thanks for your comments and post.

One issue I hadn't considered (but which was raised in Classroom 2.0: http://tinyurl.com/4hsa28) is that of the "walled garden" -- not so much in terms of protecting the information posted online (as in my university scenario), but rather the protection of the students themselves in K-12 environments.

I realize this is a hot topic for all educators, and will likely remain so as more and more communication tools are developed and adopted.

When the choice is available between using in-house or third party web tools, I wonder how many educators discuss the pros and cons of either choice with their students before making a collective decision? And how many institutions are supportive of such an approach?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>Many thanks for your comments and post.</p>
<p>One issue I hadn&#8217;t considered (but which was raised in Classroom 2.0: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/4hsa28" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/4hsa28</a>) is that of the &#8220;walled garden&#8221; &#8212; not so much in terms of protecting the information posted online (as in my university scenario), but rather the protection of the students themselves in K-12 environments.</p>
<p>I realize this is a hot topic for all educators, and will likely remain so as more and more communication tools are developed and adopted.</p>
<p>When the choice is available between using in-house or third party web tools, I wonder how many educators discuss the pros and cons of either choice with their students before making a collective decision? And how many institutions are supportive of such an approach?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
